AOTRAUMA.ORG Центр Илизарова  

Ортопедия и травматология Общие вопросы/General questions Help Информационные технологии в медицине
 вверх
 отправить
 поиск
 админ
 главная
 Предыдущее


Re: Ilizarov vs Orthofix
Odessky Jacob M.D. 27 Апрель 2006, 17:28
Dear Nicola! I have asked us why we prefer the Ilizarov external fixator instead of the modern Orthofix that is for quite all purpose in trauma (according to you experience) and in selected orthopedics problems. What is the reason, if one, to use the Ilizarov instead of the more technological kind of external fixators?
I▓ll try to answer this question very simply. I prefer Ilizarov▓s device because biomechanically, clinically and practically it▓s much better than Orthofix!
I incur to tell greater - the Ilizarov Ex. Fix. augmented by Hexapod Set better not only Orthofix, but also the Taylor Spatial Frame.

  • Сообщения о Ортопедия и травматология
  • Также Odessky Jacob M.D.
  • Связаться с автором
  • Файл-вложение
  • Кликните для загрузки файла 2005-09 (ס
    12KB (12366 bytes)

  • Ответить

    Re: Ilizarov vs Orthofix
    John 14 Октябрь 2007, 21:21
    Hi,

    I have stumbled across this forum. I have had experience with Taylor Spatial Frame. As a matter of fact my tibia was severely damaged. Luckily I got one of these fixators fitted on. I think the ring fixators offer better mechanical conditions at fracture site of long bones. For other types of bones this might not be the case.

    I found very helpful the information provided on the www.bonefixator.com . Check out there the sections on bone healing, fractures, and fixation methods to get better understanding why and when to use external ring fixation.

    I hope this helps for people who are still looking at this forum.

    John

    [ Ответить ]


    ( Ответить )

    Powered by Zope  Squishdot Powered MedLink
    Посетитель: 0000024
      "По форме правильно, а по существу - издевательство" В.И.Ленин
    ©2001-2019Orthoforum Coordinator.
    [ Главная | Отправить сообщение | Поиск | Админ ]