ВХОД ДЛЯ ПАЦИЕНТОВ
вверх
поиск
админ
главная
исходное
последующие
|
Re: Дэнас и эндопротезирование
послал SAGO 13 Сентябрь 2009, 03:08
|
Daniel Trudel, Jennifer Duley, Ingrid Zastrow etc. Rehabilitation for Patients with Lateral
Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review// J HAND THER. 2004;17:243√266.- ⌠This review has determined, with at least level 2b evidence, that a number of treatments, including acupuncture, exercise therapy, manipulations and mobilizations, ultrasound, phonophoresis, Rebox, and ionization with diclofenac all show positive effects in the reduction of pain or improvement in function for patients with lateral epicondylitis.■
Manheimer E, White A, Berman B, Forys K, Ernst E. Meta-analysis: acupuncture for low back pain.// Ann Intern Med. 2005 Apr 19;142(8):651-63. √⌠CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture effectively relieves chronic low back pain.■
Vas J, Perea-Milla E, Méndez C, Sánchez Navarro C, León Rubio JM, Brioso M, García Obrero I. Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for chronic uncomplicated neck pain: a randomised controlled study.// Pain. 2006 Dec 15;126(1-3):245-55. √ ⌠The improvements in quality of life (physical aspect), active neck mobility and reduced rescue medication were clinically and statistically significant. In the treatment of the intensity of chronic neck pain, acupuncture is more effective than the placebo treatment and presents a safety profile making it suitable for routine use in clinical practice.■
Irnich D, Behrens N, Gleditsch JM, Stör W, Schreiber MA, Schöps P, Vickers AJ, Beyer A. Immediate effects of dry needling and acupuncture at distant points in chronic neck pain: results of a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover trial.// Pain. 2002 Sep;99(1-2):83-9. √ ⌠For motion-related pain, use of acupuncture at non-local points reduced pain scores by about a third (11.2 mm; 95% CI 5.7, 16.7; P = 0.00006) compared to DN and sham. DN led to an estimated reduction in pain of 1.0 mm (95% CI -4.5, 6.5; P = 0.7). Use of DN slightly improved ROM by 1.7 degrees (95% CI 0.2, 3.2; P = 0.032) with use of non-local points improving ROM by an additional 1.9 degrees (95% CI 0.3, 3.4; P = 0.016). For patient assessment of change, non-local acupuncture was significantly superior both to Sham (1.7 points; 95% CI 1.0, 2.5; P = 0.0001) and DN (1.5 points; 95% CI 0.4, 2.6; P = 0.008) but there was no difference between DN and Sham (0.1 point; 95% CI -1.0, 1.2; P = 0.8). Acupuncture is superior to Sham in improving motion-related pain and ROM following a single session of treatment in chronic neck pain patients. Acupuncture at distant points improves ROM more than DN; DN was ineffective for motion-related pain.■
|
Послать ответ |
Обратите внимание: Поля с жирными названиями обязательны.
Старайтесь отвечать в рамках обсуждаемой темы, а не начинать новые обсуждения.
Указывайте адекватную тему сообщения, чтобы было ясно, о чем оно.
Не послайте сообщений не по теме (оффтопик), раздраженных, грубых или обидных комментариев. Здесь это неуместно.
|